> there has to be a message behind it Well, when people say that, they usually mean that everything should carry a forced interpretation/morale rather than be open to interpretation by reader/viewer/listener.
> there has to be a message behind it Well, when people say that, they usually mean that everything should carry a forced interpretation/morale rather than be open to interpretation by reader/viewer/listener.
Lobo Antunes passed away last week and I was really shaken by that. He's my favorite Portuguese author and he always mogged Saramago in every possible way. It's a shame not a lot of people got to know him, but a few of his books were translated into English. It's really worth it.
>>21 He was praised by being retarded, I can give you that. That's something I'll never understand. Most of his books are bad and his language just makes them even worse. He just pretended he was some kind of Portuguese Faulkner but he was just an awful author.
Lobo Antunes passed away last week and I was really shaken by that. He's my favorite Portuguese author and he always mogged Saramago in every possible way. It's a shame not a lot of people got to know him, but a few of his books were translated into English. It's really worth it.
>>21 He was praised by being retarded, I can give you that. That's something I'll never understand. Most of his books are bad and his language just makes them even worse. He just pretended he was some kind of Portuguese Faulkner but he was just an awful author.
>I was asked if I liked Brazil. I said no, because the country is full of negroes. They didn't like that at all. You can't say anything against negroes. The only merit they have is that they've been mistreated, and as Bernard Shaw observed, that's no merit.
>I was asked if I liked Brazil. I said no, because the country is full of negroes. They didn't like that at all. You can't say anything against negroes. The only merit they have is that they've been mistreated, and as Bernard Shaw observed, that's no merit.